A smaller world

Leading Canadian economist, Jeff Rubin, sets out the premise of his book “Why your World is about to get a whole lot smaller” in this 45 minute video from 2009′s The Business of Climate Change Conference.

We aren’t running out of oil. But the supply of oil we can afford – the $30 a barrel Saudi crude we’ve been lifting for the last 100 years – went into permanent decline around 2007. Its replacement – deep water, arctic, sub salt and most particularly tar sand – is two or three times the cost.

That matters. It doesn’t just run our cars (60% of all consumption is transportation). We eat it, wear it, see by it, keep warm by it and prop the financial system Ponzi scheme up with it. As its cost rises, the cost of everything rises. We saw that in 2008 – oil shock cost inflation drove the bottom economic segment into default on the repayments of their toxic mortgages, triggering the wider collapse of the exotic derivatives market.

At the same time, demand is rising in the non-OECD countries. They have no price memory, the new $2,500 Tata nano adds a few hundred million straws in the global oil supply. Worse, price doesn’t ration demand in the key OPEC suppliers because of fuel subsidies.

So prices are set to rise – “triple digit oil price”, and within 12-18 months, depending on the pace of the artificial recovery currently underway. The US economy crashes whenever the oil price exceeds $80 a barrel (it’s $79.99 as I write this). So we are heading for another, probably permanent recession.

Globalism is dead – it implicitly assumes that transportation is free, and now it isn’t. So the massive supply chains that supply our food and materials are about to fail.

It can’t be prevented, but we can do something to insulate our economy. Primarily, we need to relocalise. We need to make stuff where it is used, grow food where it is eaten, make power where it is consumed, live where we work.

Then we need to price carbon, to ration demand. Since not everyone will do it, we need to impose import tariffs to deny economic advantage to those who won’t.

Who knows if you can decouple peak oil from peak GDP – I think it is highly unlikely. You certainly can’t avoid the massive costs implied by rebuilding the local supply chains recently dismantled by gloablisation. Rubin thinks there are some benefits from the different way of life this necessitates. I agree.

Posted in Economics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The story of cap + trade

I have to admit, I waver on Climate Change. But the methodology employed to subvert climate change intervention, and in particular the distractions created by them to real action, are equally applicable to energy security interventions and efforts to expose them are valuable.

The Story of Cap+Trade (why you can’t solve a problem with the thinking that created it)” is a deceptively simple analysis of the devil in cap and trade’s detail. Designed by Enron and Goldman Sachs (of subprime mortgage fame), the carbon emission cap and trade system is a device to allow “business as usual” to continue while creating a false sense of progress AND lining the financiers pockets with the next Ponzi scheme. Continue reading

Posted in Economics, Videos | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arithmetic, Population & Energy

Society, as we have constructed it, cannot function without an exponentially growing energy supply. Dr. Albert A. Bartlett, using nothing more than high school maths, demonstrates just how impractical this is.

Posted in Videos | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Industry Experts Offer Growing Drumbeat of Supply Warnings

Groups and individuals speaking out about forthcoming world oil supply challenges are frequently stereotyped as a fringe element with little knowledge about the oil industry. But their warnings are increasingly supported by some surprising allies: senior petroleum industry officials, consultants and analysts. Call these serious-minded critics the Harsh Realists.

Most prominent are CEO’s from several large oil companies. Christophe de Margerie, CEO of France’s Total SA, said earlier this year, “world oil production may plateau below 90 million barrels a day (mb/day)” — marginally more supply than today’s 85 mb/day rate. Last month, CEO’s James Mulva (ConocoPhillips) and John Hess (Hess Corp.), sounded similar warnings, though with less specificity about the numbers, at the Oil & Money Conference in London. At ASPO-USA’s October conference in Denver, Ray Leonard, CEO of Hyperdynamics Corp., said, “world oil was nearing peak oil at 90 mb/day, and that isn’t changed by recent events.”

During September, ASPO-USA representatives interviewed numerous oil industry experts from the UK, Ireland and the Middle East. Links to those online videos are below. Featured is Sadad al Husseini, former exploration and production VP with Saudi Aramco and currently a consultant. Said Husseini, “There is not enough new capacity coming on line, within say the next five to six years, to make up for global declines. And that’s assuming a very moderate level of declines.” For groups that remain in fundamental denial about upcoming world oil supply constraints, Husseini said, ” these centers of information or knowledge that try to pacify people — telling them there is no challenge, with good intentions — are probably compromising the solutions. They’re not helping.”

Talisman Energy’s former CEO James Buckee wonders why major oil companies “aren’t more forthcoming on the peak oil issue.” He then opines, “if Exxon were to come out [about peak oil], it would be world-shaking, and political, and maybe they don’t want to go there.”

Jeremy Gilbert, former Chief Petroleum Engineer with BP and now a consultant, stated “I find it hard to believe that the [oil] companies cannot see that the exploration record suggests that there’s a real problem with new discoveries.”

Jeremy Leggett, former petroleum geologist and lead author of the UK’s Industry Task Force on Peak Oil and Energy Security, worries that “we’re dealing with dysfunctional culture in the energy industry in the same way the world had to deal with the really dysfunctional culture in the investment banking community. It’s different [from the financial crisis] in that this time, there are many people warning. Many people in and around the oil industry…But most governments are not listening.”

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Head in the sand

The International Energy Agency was established in the wake of the 1974 oil crisis. Its functions are to provide authoritative information on the supply of oil, and energy policy advice based on it to its member nations. The IEA has admitted that, under political pressure from the US, for a decade it has grossly inflated estimates of remaining oil reserves. Under its new head, Dr Fatih Birol, it has recently “come clean” and issued shockingly lower reservers estimates. Dr Birol warns:

the public and many governments appear to be oblivious to the fact that the oil on which modern civilisation depends is running out far faster than previously predicted and global production is likely to peak in about 10 years–at least a decade earlier than most governments have estimated.[2]
The impacts of a permanent decline in the availability of oil and gas will be supply interruptions, spiking energy prices, unprecedented economic, political and social upheaval and continued economic deterioration.[3]

According to the UK Government’s Department of Energy and Climate Change:

The first result of problems with supply, however caused, is likely to be a jump in the price as the market responds, rather than physical interruptions to supply. Such price increases are costly for consumers, but actual supply interruptions have greater costs – forcing 10% of gas demand off the system involuntarily could cost the economy £300m a day.[4]
So the official, competent policy advisor to the UK advises it that oil and gas supplies are shortly to enter permanent decline, and the DECC has already worked out that even small, short duration interruptions will cost hundreds of millions of pounds per day.

It seems obvious that a strategic review of, say, the “scale of the challenge and risks facing the GB and wider European and global energy markets over the next two decades” would want to take a pretty close look at this and make sure our actions are appropriate.

The UK’s gas and electricity market regulator, OFGEM, is embarking on such a strategic review.[5] “Project Discovery–Energy Market Scenarios”, who’s objective is quoted above, is intended as “a definitive investigation into whether or not future security of supply can be delivered by the existing market arrangements over the coming decade.” According to the Energy Minister, “Ofgem is examining a range of hypothetical scenarios, it’s prudent to do so, however unlikely they are“. In the project consultation document, OFGEM set out the scenarios they propose to evaluate. See if you can spot anything missing:

In developing our scenarios we have considered a wide range of uncertainties. From these, we selected the two key uncertainties which we believed will most likely shape different future outcomes for the GB energy markets. These are, first the speed of global economic recovery, and, second the extent of globally co-ordinated environmental action (section 2.15, page 13)
Conspicuous by its absence is any awareness, much less consideration, of the permanent contraction of our energy base.

This is a fatal omission, but its source is not mysterious. Geological constraints on the market are anathema to energy regulators, for non-economic constraints deny the possibility of a market and without the market they (and by extension, their masters the UK government) are nothing.

By coincidence, I asked Scotland’s Minister for Tourism (and Energy) Jim Mather whether the Scottish government was taking the risk of supply interruptions seriously. I did not follow his response, but I didn’t hear anything reassuring amongst the words. He is, apparently, an accountant by training and therefore believes he understands oil forecasting.

References

[1] “Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower”, Guardian, 9 November 2009 [2] “Warning: Oil supplies are running out fast”, Guardian, 3 August 2009 [3] “Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, mitigations and risks”. Hirsh, R 2005 [4] “Energy Market Outlook 2008″, Department of Energy and Climate Change, p7 link [5] “Project Discovery–Energy Market Scenarios”, OFGEM link

Posted in Economics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. Unemployment animation

There are now 31 million people unemployed in the U.S. as a result of the worst economic upheaval since the Great Depression. This animation of unemployment rate by county shows the deteriorating transformation of the U.S. economy from January 2007–approximately one year before the start of the recession–to the most recent unemployment data available today.

Posted in Videos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Global Oil Depletion Report

The report finds:

  • Despite large uncertainties in the available data, sufficient information is available to allow the status and risk of global oil depletion to be adequately assessed. But the available methodologies can frequently lead to underestimates of resource size and overly pessimistic forecasts of future supply
  • The rate of decline of production is accelerating. More than two thirds of existing capacity may need to be replaced by 2030 solely to prevent production from falling
  • While large resources of conventional oil may be available, these are unlikely to be accessed quickly and may make little difference to the timing of the global peak
  • A peak in conventional oil production before 2030 appears likely and there is a significant risk of a peak before 2020. Given the lead times required to both develop substitute fuels and improve energy efficiency, this risk needs to be given serious consideration

Posted in Presentations | Tagged | Leave a comment

Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower

The world is much closer to running out of oil than official estimates admit, according to a whistleblower at the International Energy Agency who claims it has been deliberately underplaying a looming shortage for fear of triggering panic buying.
Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Did oil cause the latest recession? IEA weighs into the debate

The IEA points out that it had warned in 2006 that the effect of high oil prices from the preceding four years had not yet worked their way through the world economy, and that further increases in prices would “pose a significant threat to the world economy, by causing a worsening of current account imbalances and by triggering abrupt exchange rate realignments, a rise in interest rates and a slump in house and other asset prices”.
Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

A post-oil world gets less sci-fi by the day

The IEA figures showed there could be a gap of 7m barrels a day between supply and demand by 2015. That represents about 8% of the expected world demand by then, 91m barrels a day. The gap will grow as demand keeps growing. Taylor warns that world supply levelled off between 2005 and 2008, so quite where the new oil is going to come from is unclear.
Posted in Articles | Leave a comment